VDACS uses a competitive review process to evaluate all applications and ensure the greatest overall impact. Each proposal is reviewed by a panel whose members are free from conflicts of interest and committed to conducting fair and impartial evaluations. As part of this process, the review panel may also recommend an award amount for selected projects. Once the review is complete, VDACS will notify all applicants—both successful and unsuccessful—of the outcome as it relates to their proposal.
Project purpose will be evaluated based on the extent to which the applicant clearly defines a plan to work with local farmers and vendors to establish relationships for purchasing food, as well as how effectively the project will provide a direct benefit to individuals experiencing food insecurity. Consideration will also be given to the applicant’s ability to demonstrate large-scale, community-wide, or regional impact.
Measurable outcomes will be assessed based on whether the proposed objectives are clear, attainable, and aligned with the overall purpose of the grant program.
The project plan will be evaluated on the extent to which the application presents a clear, well-developed, and appropriate methodology for achieving the project’s goals and objectives, including the presence of a defined timeline for implementation and a clearly articulated plan for assessing project performance.
The budget will be evaluated based on whether the application provides sufficient detail for each budget category, ensures that costs are appropriate for the size and scope of the project, and demonstrates a logical connection between the budget, project plan, and stated objectives.